SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Cybersurf (CY.A) - Bridge between 20th & 21st Centuries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: donkeyman who wrote (2232)9/6/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: LABMAN  Respond to of 3243
 
ISP'S face a choice Evolution or Extinction


Monday, September 6, 1999

ISPs Face a Choice: Evolution or Extinction
Internet: As media and phone giants invade their turf, access providers are
reinventing themselves with new content, services or a unique niche.
By KAREN KAPLAN, Times Staff Writer


John Brown is president of IHighway.net, an
Internet service provider in Albuquerque
that caters to businesses with high-speed
connections on ISDN and T-1 lines. Even with a
mere 200 customers, Brown said, the 3-year-old
company posts profit margins that surpass 50%.
But he isn't savoring his success. Instead, like
most people who run ISPs, Brown is frantic about
finding new avenues for growth, lest he be
overtaken by bigger rivals with much deeper
pockets.
"We have to keep growing the network to be
bigger and better," he said. "That's the only way we
can afford the new technologies. It's like a
perpetual motion machine."
For years, companies such as IHighway.net
dominated the market for online access. But with
the Internet blossoming into a full-scale
communications network, media giants ranging
from AT&T and Time Warner to America Online
are using their huge war chests to muscle their way
to the head of the industry.
Their heavy spending on the latest broadband
technologies and splashy entertainment content are
putting enormous pressure on independent Internet
providers to reinvent themselves--or risk going out
of business.
It's not just small Internet service providers that are feeling the pinch.
Even large ISPs such as EarthLink Network and MindSpring
Enterprises are in danger if they don't find a way to be more than a
simple conduit from a PC to the global computer network.
"Three years ago, if you had a fast, reliable connection with no [busy
signals], you could pretty much write your ticket," said Garry Betty,
chief executive of Pasadena-based EarthLink. "Now people expect that
as a baseline. Your ability to differentiate your service means you have
to do things like good software, easy-to-use mail and high-quality tech
support."
The conventional wisdom used to be that Internet access was
destined to become a commodity, with a few companies offering service
as uniform as dial tones. Now that the industry is maturing, those early
predictions have changed. Instead, industry leaders and analysts now
predict a future in which users will have a choice of four distinct varieties
of Internet service:
* A handful of giant companies, such as America Online and AT&T,
will bundle Internet access with other telecommunications services,
ranging from local and long-distance phone service to movies on
demand.
* Other large Internet service providers--cobbled together from
mergers of today's middle-market ISPs--will focus on delivering
high-speed access and related services to businesses.
* A new class of "vanity ISPs" will emerge, allowing groups ranging
from college alumni associations to a beagle breeders' club to share their
affiliation in cyberspace.
* Thousands of small Internet service providers in secondary and
rural markets will continue to earn a healthy living with fewer than
10,000 customers each.
Gone will be the roughly $20 monthly fee for unlimited online access.
In its place will be pricing programs that charge fees based on the
connection's speed and reliability--with demanding uses such as
game-playing and videoconferencing more expensive than simple e-mail.
Some, such as Westlake Village-based NetZero, may even offer
Internet service free of charge, subsidized by revenue from advertising
and electronic commerce.
Internet service providers will also offer high-speed connections,
Internet phone capabilities and Web-based video services to entice
customers, said Greg Tally, associate editor of Boardwatch magazine, a
Golden, Colo.-based publication that covers ISPs.
With more than 5,000 Internet service providers in North America,
the possibilities for experimentation are great. The flashiest innovations
are expected to come from the top tier of about 300 ISPs that together
account for 90% of the network traffic, according to Shane Greenstein,
an associate professor of management and strategy at Northwestern
University's J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
America Online alone serves more than half of the nation's 34 million
Internet households, and Barry Schuler, president of AOL's Interactive
Services Group in Dulles, Va., thinks he knows why.
"We bundle a group of services like content channels, chat and
e-mail," Schuler said. More bundles are on the horizon, and a number of
varied offerings are likely to survive in the marketplace, he said.
AT&T is building a bundle of its own that links Internet access with
other telecom services.
"With our long-distance, wireless and cable assets, we have the
opportunity to extend our Internet service in ways that no one has done
before," said Michael Chaplo, vice president of marketing for AT&T's
WorldNet, which has more than 1.6 million subscribers.
AT&T has also made a content play. The @Home cable service it
gained control of through its acquisition of Tele-Communications Inc.
bought Web portal Excite on the theory that even high-speed
connections will be a low-profit commodity, while the real profit
potential will lie in giving subscribers a unique entertainment experience.
EarthLink and Atlanta-based MindSpring, which have 1.4 million
and 1.2 million members respectively, insist they will be able to attract
and retain subscribers simply by offering high-quality customer service,
without layering on entertainment or information content.
But analysts doubt that will be enough. The companies will need to
offer a more complete package of services to appease their customers,
whether they take the AOL route and focus on content or follow
AT&T's lead and concentrate on telecommunications. Either strategy
will be expensive and may require the companies to essentially merge
themselves out of business.
"Those two companies are at a pivotal point," said Dave Eiswert,
director of ISP research for Strategist Group, a telecommunications
consulting firm in Washington. "They're going to have to be more. The
question for them is 'How do we do these transactions?' "
Rumors swirled this summer that EarthLink was holding merger talks
with PC manufacturer Gateway. Long-distance phone service provider
Sprint--which owns 28% of EarthLink--is also seen as a possible
acquirer. Under their agreement, however, Sprint can't launch a bid for
EarthLink any sooner than the fall of 2001 unless EarthLink invites an
offer. But if another company makes a play for EarthLink, Sprint will be
free to match or top it. Either way, many analysts see an
EarthLink-Sprint merger as inevitable.
For its part, MindSpring has made vague statements about exploring
potential "business combinations."
"The number of potential combinations would be pretty vast," said
MindSpring President Mike McQuary. Generally speaking, ISPs could
marry other ISPs, telephone companies, personal computer makers,
Internet portal sites, software companies or cable firms, he said.
Merger activity is already well underway in another segment of the
market. Among ISPs that serve between 5,000 and 100,000 customers,
"there's been more [mergers and acquisitions] in the last six months than
in the previous six years," said Deb Howard, executive director emeritus
of the ISP Consortium and co-founder of 2 Cow Herd, an ISP in
Venice.
Wall Street's enthusiasm for Internet-related stocks has helped fuel
merger activity by giving publicly traded ISPs the currency to buy their
smaller brethren. New technologies, such as high-speed digital
subscriber line service, are expensive for small companies to deploy,
and that makes buyout offers more appealing. These trends have
combined to create a new breed of "roll-up ISP," such as Verio,
Voyager and OneMain.com.
"The interest in rolling up ISPs is tremendous," said Eiswert of
Strategist Group.
Walnut Creek-based Verio has bought about 50 small Internet
service providers in the last three years and now serves 254,000
business customers in 41 big cities, said Paul Montoya, Verio's vice
president of marketing. But the shopping spree has slowed.
"We're running out of sizable companies to buy," Montoya said. "The
larger ones have already been purchased or may not be the right fit for
us because they're consumer-focused." Instead, Verio has turned its
attention to companies that host corporate Web sites and has snapped
up five so far.
OneMain.com, based in Vienna, Va., has bought 22 regional ISPs in
less than two years, including companies serving Sacramento, Fresno,
Bakersfield and San Luis Obispo. The company now has more than
520,000 subscribers in small-market cities, said Steve Smith,
OneMain.com's founder and chief executive.
Unlike Verio, OneMain.com is focused on consumers. Smith plans
to build a collection of locally themed Web sites for cities his company
serves. Then OneMain.com will be able to augment its access-fee
income with revenue from e-commerce and advertising, he said.
"We don't view ourselves as an ISP per se," Smith said. "We view
ourselves as an aggregator of content."
Some are taking an easier route by becoming virtual Internet service
providers. A real ISP such as EarthLink provides the actual service, and
the partner--a company, club or other organization--provides the
customers.
"Say I'm the World Wildlife Federation and I have a pool of people
who are interested in me," said Joe Laszlo, an access and bandwidth
analyst with Jupiter Communications in New York. "I pay [EarthLink]
every month, and I get to be the dial-up ISP, even though I don't need
to own the facilities."
The arrangement is so popular that "ISPs are starting that are based
around ex-cancer patients and dog lovers," Eiswert said. "It connects a
group of people that have similar characteristics. Personalization is
becoming more and more important."
But for the foreseeable future, the majority of Internet service
providers--perhaps 75% or more--are likely to remain small. Although
they serve no more than 25 area codes, they need only about 1,000
dial-up customers to become profitable. Plus, operators in small
communities usually aren't challenged by ISPs with national aspirations.
As long as there are Net users who prefer personal service, there will
always be small ISPs, Greenstein said.
"Why don't we just have Midas doing all the muffler repairs around
the country?" he said. "Because there are local service shops where they
have an ongoing relationship with their customer. That could happen
with ISPs. Customers will want to have the local guy they can call at 2
a.m. to make a repair."

* * *

Internet Service Boom
Analysts expect the number of internet service providers to double to
10,000 in five years, and they expect four distinct kinds of ISPs to
emerge:
Giant companies will combine Internet access with other
telecommunications servicees, including delivery of digital entertainment.
* * *
Mid-and-large-sized ISPs will combine to deliver high-speed access
and other Web services to businesses.
* * *
A new class of "vanity ISPs" ill allow affinity groups, such as college
alumni associations,to share an identity in cyberspace.
* * *
Thousands of small Internet access providers will serve secondary
and rural markets, with fewer than 10,000 customers apiece.
* * *
Internet Service Providers (in North America)
April, 1999: 5,078
* * *
Internal Revenue (in billions)
1998: $8.4 million
* * *
PCs Using the Internet (in millions)
1998: 84 million

Sources: Boardwatch magazine's directory of Internet service
providers; Dataquest
* * *
Times staff writer Karen Kaplan can be reached at karen.kaplan
@latimes.com.

Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved

Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
INTERNET (COMPUTER NETWORK), COMPUTER SERVICE INDUSTRY,
INFORMATION SERVICE INDUSTRY, COMPUTER NETWORKS. You will not
be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one.




To: donkeyman who wrote (2232)9/8/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: LABMAN  Respond to of 3243
 
NETZERO IPO STORY FROM STREET.COM



NetZero Rolls Free-ISP Dice
With $100 Million IPO
By Kevin Petrie
Staff Reporter
9/8/99 8:38 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO -- After winning half a million
subscribers in two months, NetZero is placing a
heavy wager on the appetite of Wall Street for its
initial public offering expected this month.

NetZero plans to sell a whopping 10 million shares
and raise roughly $100 million in an IPO
underwritten by Goldman Sachs, according to
filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Goldman expects to price shares the
evening of Sept. 23 and start trading the next day.
Unlike conventional ISPs, NetZero connects users
to the Internet for free and instead counts on
advertisers for revenue.

In July and August, NetZero grew its subscriber
base to 1.7 million from 1.2 million, NetZero said in
amended SEC filings. That surpasses its rivals
MindSpring (MSPG:Nasdaq) and Earthlink
(ELNK:Nasdaq), each of whom have roughly 1.3
million paying subscribers. This summer NetZero
has more than doubled their recent growth rates.
NetZero's suggested market capitalization would
price each user at $612, still less than half the
valuation of MindSpring.

While NetZero is often treated as a backup service,
its actual visitors did jump to 891,000 in August
from 613,000 in July. The sheer number of eyeballs
garners respect even from money managers who
are skeptical of free ISPs.

"They're growing pretty quickly, and that is
exciting," says Mike Dubrow, analyst with
New-York-based Jacob Asset Management in
New York. Dubrow says serious growth in
advertising revenue might lag by a quarter or two,
and he seeks more details about the habits of
NetZero's customers.

The company could certainly use the IPO money. It
posted a $15.3 million net loss last year, and
expects losses to increase -- not simply continue --
"for the foreseeable future." NetZero intends to
spend the funds on working capital, capital
expenditures and possible acquisitions. Restricted
by a "quiet period" prior to the offering, NetZero
officials declined to comment for this story.

To raise the cash, NetZero is offering a float larger
than many successful Net IPOs. Most Internet
companies have sold less than 6 million shares in
their IPOs, perhaps to tantalize Wall Street. "What
has really kept this market alive has been the
smaller deals which never satisfy the demand,"
says David Menlow, editor of IPO Frontline, a
newsletter for individual investors.

By betting on a higher demand, NetZero is following
the example of the e-commerce site priceline.com
(PCLN:Nasdaq), which sold 10 million shares at 16
in March and watched them quadruple on the first
day. Priceline then ran to 160, and has since
settled at 63. Less encouraging was the IPO of
NYSE floor-trading "specialist" firm LaBranche &
Co. (LAB:NYSE), which issued 10.5 million shares
at 14 last month and has since seen them slip
underwater.

So NetZero is wagering that investors like eyeballs,
but in short order it must turn the eyeballs into
dollar signs. Both its audience and ads are
increasing: In August, 891,000 users accessed
NetZero and were delivered 1.2 billion ad
impressions. In June, 613,000 visitors watched 830
million ads.

NetZero can expect more and more advertisers to
demand "performance-based" contracts. Forrester
Research predicts that by 2003, half of all online
ads will be priced per click, per lead or per
customer.

For example, Fleet Credit Card Services has
bought ad impressions from NetZero and has
agreed to pay extra for each customer it wins
through NetZero's advertising window on the PC
screen. NetZero has committed to delivering a
minimum number of credit card accounts.

Chris Jenkins, president of the ISP ZipLink in
Lowell, Mass., says such "sales commissions" will
become the norm. Free ISPs can thrive, he says, if
their users make just one or two expensive
purchases per year.

Goldman is promoting a big deal. NetZero will have
102.9 million outstanding shares. At the suggested
valuation of roughly $1 billion, or 9 to 11 per share,
the WestLake Village, Calif.-based company would
be valued at roughly 224 times its revenue of $4.6
million in the year ended June 30. MindSpring and
Earthlink trade at 8 and 6 times revenue,
respectively.

To be sure, two-year-old NetZero, with barely 100
employees on its payroll, remains an unknown
quantity. It is late in its Y2K preparations. The
management team lacks proven entrepreneurs.
NetZero CEO Mark Goldston also was CEO of
Einstein/Noah Bagel (ENBX:Nasdaq); he brought
it public in 1996 and left in December 1997 after the
stock had fallen 80% from its highs.

However, at least one NetZero manager knows how
to gauge investor demand: CFO Charles Hilliard is a
former investment banker with Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter.

Meanwhile, NetZero is spreading fast, and at the
suggested offering price its customers will be valued
cheaply. Overall, the company seems to have the
ingredients of an exciting Internet IPO. "For the
initial push," says Menlow, "these stocks are the
premier source of adrenaline."

Send letters to the editor to
letters@thestreet.com.
Top
Read our conflicts and disclosure policy.








SEARCH TSC

TECH STOCKS >> NETWORKING

NetZero Rolls Free-ISP Dice
With $100 Million IPO
By Kevin Petrie
Staff Reporter
9/8/99 8:38 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO -- After winning half a million
subscribers in two months, NetZero is placing a
heavy wager on the appetite of Wall Street for its
initial public offering expected this month.

NetZero plans to sell a whopping 10 million shares
and raise roughly $100 million in an IPO
underwritten by Goldman Sachs, according to
filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Goldman expects to price shares the
evening of Sept. 23 and start trading the next day.
Unlike conventional ISPs, NetZero connects users
to the Internet for free and instead counts on
advertisers for revenue.

In July and August, NetZero grew its subscriber
base to 1.7 million from 1.2 million, NetZero said in
amended SEC filings. That surpasses its rivals
MindSpring (MSPG:Nasdaq) and Earthlink
(ELNK:Nasdaq), each of whom have roughly 1.3
million paying subscribers. This summer NetZero
has more than doubled their recent growth rates.
NetZero's suggested market capitalization would
price each user at $612, still less than half the
valuation of MindSpring.

While NetZero is often treated as a backup service,
its actual visitors did jump to 891,000 in August
from 613,000 in July. The sheer number of eyeballs
garners respect even from money managers who
are skeptical of free ISPs.

"They're growing pretty quickly, and that is
exciting," says Mike Dubrow, analyst with
New-York-based Jacob Asset Management in
New York. Dubrow says serious growth in
advertising revenue might lag by a quarter or two,
and he seeks more details about the habits of
NetZero's customers.

The company could certainly use the IPO money. It
posted a $15.3 million net loss last year, and
expects losses to increase -- not simply continue --
"for the foreseeable future." NetZero intends to
spend the funds on working capital, capital
expenditures and possible acquisitions. Restricted
by a "quiet period" prior to the offering, NetZero
officials declined to comment for this story.

To raise the cash, NetZero is offering a float larger
than many successful Net IPOs. Most Internet
companies have sold less than 6 million shares in
their IPOs, perhaps to tantalize Wall Street. "What
has really kept this market alive has been the
smaller deals which never satisfy the demand,"
says David Menlow, editor of IPO Frontline, a
newsletter for individual investors.

By betting on a higher demand, NetZero is following
the example of the e-commerce site priceline.com
(PCLN:Nasdaq), which sold 10 million shares at 16
in March and watched them quadruple on the first
day. Priceline then ran to 160, and has since
settled at 63. Less encouraging was the IPO of
NYSE floor-trading "specialist" firm LaBranche &
Co. (LAB:NYSE), which issued 10.5 million shares
at 14 last month and has since seen them slip
underwater.

So NetZero is wagering that investors like eyeballs,
but in short order it must turn the eyeballs into
dollar signs. Both its audience and ads are
increasing: In August, 891,000 users accessed
NetZero and were delivered 1.2 billion ad
impressions. In June, 613,000 visitors watched 830
million ads.

NetZero can expect more and more advertisers to
demand "performance-based" contracts. Forrester
Research predicts that by 2003, half of all online
ads will be priced per click, per lead or per
customer.

For example, Fleet Credit Card Services has
bought ad impressions from NetZero and has
agreed to pay extra for each customer it wins
through NetZero's advertising window on the PC
screen. NetZero has committed to delivering a
minimum number of credit card accounts.

Chris Jenkins, president of the ISP ZipLink in
Lowell, Mass., says such "sales commissions" will
become the norm. Free ISPs can thrive, he says, if
their users make just one or two expensive
purchases per year.

Goldman is promoting a big deal. NetZero will have
102.9 million outstanding shares. At the suggested
valuation of roughly $1 billion, or 9 to 11 per share,
the WestLake Village, Calif.-based company would
be valued at roughly 224 times its revenue of $4.6
million in the year ended June 30. MindSpring and
Earthlink trade at 8 and 6 times revenue,
respectively.

To be sure, two-year-old NetZero, with barely 100
employees on its payroll, remains an unknown
quantity. It is late in its Y2K preparations. The
management team lacks proven entrepreneurs.
NetZero CEO Mark Goldston also was CEO of
Einstein/Noah Bagel (ENBX:Nasdaq); he brought
it public in 1996 and left in December 1997 after the
stock had fallen 80% from its highs.

However, at least one NetZero manager knows how
to gauge investor demand: CFO Charles Hilliard is a
former investment banker with Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter.

Meanwhile, NetZero is spreading fast, and at the
suggested offering price its customers will be valued
cheaply. Overall, the company seems to have the
ingredients of an exciting Internet IPO. "For the
initial push," says Menlow, "these stocks are the
premier source of adrenaline."

Send letters to the editor to
letters@thestreet.com.
Top
Read our conflicts and disclosure policy.

GET STOCK QUOTES

symbol name

TECH STOCKS
ARCHIVE
Read past stories.

© 1999 TheStreet.com, All Rights Reserved.

HOME
TSC
NOW
MARKETS
STOCK
NEWS
TECH
STOCKS
FUNDS/TAXES
COMMENTARY
INTERNATIONAL
BASICS
COMMUNITY
TSC
ON
FOX



To: donkeyman who wrote (2232)9/8/1999 10:23:00 PM
From: LABMAN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3243
 
my rough valuation of Cybersurf is as follows,based upon the NETZERO
MODEL

the average subsciber to a free ISP is currently worth $ 612 US dollars if one uses the NETZERO valuation for the IPO.

therefore convert $ 612 US DOLLARS to Canadian = 612 x 1.3 = $ 795
the current no of subscribers for CYBERSURF is approx 130,000
therefore net value of subscribers to cybersurf is 130,000 x 795
=$103.35 million
total no of shares approx issued 20.5 million
which gives a value of approx $ 5 a share,

with the TORONTO launch in the late fall, expected number of subscribers in the TORONTO REGION 250,000
add 250,000 to the current 130,O00 = 380,000
380,00 x $ 795 = $ 302 million
$ 302 million divided by the current no of shares of approx 20.5 million = $ 15 a share, the value of this would decrease slightly
if CALLNET increases ownership
of course all calculations are off if they enter the US mkt .