Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (865)	9/7/1999 4:21:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 6418

Respect for life and the desire to see respect for all human life at whatever stage protected by legislation need not have anything to do with religion at all. That's a specious argument. JLA

To: E who wrote (865)	9/7/1999 6:01:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6418

You've said you are going to do all you can to get your religious views turned into law and make me do what you want. Come on, E, with all we've meant to each other, you owe you arteeste better treatment than that. I said no such thing, and if you had been reading my posts with your usual intelligence you would know it. (It's particularly disappointing since you are one of those who normally opposes ad hominum attacks.) What I have said is that every substantive law is based moral principles; that there are no value neutral substantive laws. I haven't said I approve or disapprove. I have tried to describe what is and always has been. You obviously view with trepidation religious groups attempting to turn their views into coercive legislation. They, equally, view with trepidation atheist or secular humanist groups trying to turn their views into coercive legislation.