SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (76877)9/7/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: Eric Wells  Respond to of 164684
 
>>Covey will still be chief architect of the model.

I would view this as a negative - of course, I don't believe in Amazon's "growth-into-all-retail-sectors-at-all-costs" model - although I know you do.

Again, for the sake of AMZN longs, I hope the new CFO institutes a fiscal policy that exhibits a bit more prudence - perhaps, reining in the debt, and realizing a few dollars in profits (although this could be bad for Amazon's stock price). Although I understand the new CFO is very skilled, the only thing that worries me is his past associations with Priceline through Delta - although Jenson's dealings with Priceline netted Delta quite a pile of cash - I just view anyone who has any association with Priceline as being cause for concern.

Thanks,
-Eric



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (76877)9/7/1999 4:27:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Warren Jenson is being interviewed on CNBC...sounds like a boring guy for a not boring at all stock.



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (76877)9/7/1999 5:30:00 PM
From: Eric Wells  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Galli will not be poor.

Today's Wall Street Journal published the following information about Joe Galli's compensation package:

1. Galli was promised a $5 million signing bonus over two years - he has to stay at least two years to get the $5 million.

2. Galli received two option grants with prolonged 20-year terms to acquire 1.96 million shares (the article did not say whether that's "1.96 million total" or "1.96 million each - for a total of nearly 4 million". Nor did the article state the exercise price of the options).

3. The article also states: "He is also eligible for a separate bonus of as much as $20 million if Amazon's stock price is weak and certain options have little value. He can't begin collecting on the bonus until late June 2003. And Amazon won't finish paying the $20 million unless he remains employed there for 11 years."

In case you felt you mis-read point number 3 (as I felt when I first read it) - it does indeed mean that Galli will get $20 million even if Amazon's stock tanks.

The Amazon way.

-Eric



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (76877)9/7/1999 10:10:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
NetTrends: The threat to online shopping services
SAN FRANCISCO, Sept 7 (Reuters) - America Online <AOL.N>,
eBay Inc.<EBAY.O> and E*Trade <EGRP.O> have all suffered
system collapses and still managed to keep growing. Even mighty
Intel Corp.<INTC.O> had a much-celebrated flaw in its original
Pentium -- which went on to become the most successful tech
product ever.
Online retailers, looking at the recent history of
companies that became No. 1 in their markets despite service
outages and bugs, seem to be taking the attitude that speed to
market, being the "first mover," is the key to success.
But online retailing might be different. Two surveys
released in recent days show that online buying services are
suffering widespread problems in getting consumers the products
they've ordered, and both surveys suggested the penalty for
failing to deliver could be severe.
Dataquest, the San Jose, Calif.-based market research
company, said that about a third of the 37 million U.S.
households with access have been hit by ordering problems.
In another survey released last week, the market researcher
e-BuyersGuide.com said that one in 10 orders could not be
filled for online shoppers.
Those are more than just scattered problems, and the
surveys point to a growing restlessness among consumers with
the level of service being provided.
That could foreshadow difficult times for online pioneers
who are concentrating more on providing the lowest prices and
spending the most on advertising -- while letting service slip.
"There is no second chance to win customer loyalty," said
Harry Hoyle, who headed Dataquest's online survey.
Everywhere on the Internet there is mad dash to get to
market ahead of competitors. Internet services, influenced by
the lore of Silicon Valley, tend to put a lot of stock in the
view that getting "installed" first means success. Once your
software is embedded in a system, the conventional logic goes,
it's hard to get you out.
That might work when you're talking about computer chips --
you're not likely to yank the Pentium out of your computer if
it fails a math computation. It might also work for Internet
providers. America Online has the advantage of owning your
e-mail address, which means users won't dump the service on a
whim. E-Trade is holding your money -- which also makes for a
complicated mess when you try to change accounts.
But that's not true with online retailers. They might be
more likely to live and die by a single click of the mouse.
Mary Helen Gillespie, of Burlington, Mass.-based
e-BuyersGuide, in a study of over 400 online consumers, found
that that fully 13 percent of online buyers would not go back
to at least one site they've already used.
Gillespie believes that traditional retailers might be
well-placed in the ensuing battle for the online consumer
because they'll always put service first.
"Providing good services is increasingly going to be the
challenge that any retailer has to meet -- but for the pure
play Internet commerce company it could be a make or break
issue," said Gillespie. Traditional retailers with well-known
brand names can build up service more gradually, and take care
to protect their reputation for service as they grow.
What are the service problems reported in the surveys?
Unfilled orders is a top complaint.
Dataquest said that of households experiencing problems, 49
percent reported that they placed orders that did not arrive.
In more than half the cases customers were billed anyway for
the order.
There was widespread dissatisfaction with the ease of
communication. For a business that prides itself on
interactivity, the online services left more than 60 percent of
shoppers feeling they needed more information on their
purchases, e-BuyersGuide's study found. Dataquest said that
one-quarter of the complaints were related to the inability of
consumers to reach the retailers via e-mail.
Despite all the unhappine...



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (76877)9/7/1999 11:14:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
and return on invested capital.

William,

Let's watch our words closely:-)

Glenn