SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (39974)9/7/1999 4:35:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Man, you should copyright that stuff, JW; there's a market for it, though you are slightly out of the mainstream with comments like elative strength on daily basis diddling at midrange zero levels. Is "diddling" a recognized TA (not T&A) term?

ROFLMAO
Franq



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (39974)9/7/1999 5:29:00 PM
From: Jill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
JW: LOL and also, thanx for the perspective. Jill (EOM)



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (39974)9/7/1999 8:37:00 PM
From: MileHigh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Jim,

It was all about the 50 day MA, the weak hands being shaken out, the volume tailing off after the 23 point move down which means the heavy selling is over, and barring any more bad news we now build another solid base to move up from. The shorts will start covering as they see the Q does not violate its 50 day MA-- again.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it! <gg>

MileHigh



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (39974)9/7/1999 9:05:00 PM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Jim Willie. <unexpected positives> <unexpected negatives> This is, of course, saying that for Q, price swings are more or less rigged or instituted by large holders to fulfill the expectations of true believers in TA. Good to see you have developed a more cynical attitude toward TA and QCOM.
JohnG