Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave B who wrote (28915)	9/7/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Dave, I didn't bother to check the chart, but I was thinking RMBS was much higher then, I know it hit a high of 87 or something like that and went pretty steadily downhill from there. And I seem to remember something about a November lockup period expiration which sent the stock down further...Seems like ancient history now and in some respects, little has change (the anti-RMBS contingent was pretty vocal back then too) I dunno Dave, 30% per year seems kinda low considering what the FUD the longholders have had to endure in the past 2 years<g> bp

To: Dave B who wrote (28915)	9/7/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: John Walliker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Thread, I just noticed this in a Samsung advertisement feature in Electronics Times, 23 August 99. ... Samsung began mass production of the 72M and 144M RDRAM in January 1999, and has been supplying them to customers world-wide. This recent step [Intel validation] is significant in that it ensures adequate supplies of RDRAM from Samsung for Rambus-based systems. Samsung plans to increase production capacity of 128/144M RDRAMs to 5 million per month during the second half of this year as the company shifts its focus from SDRAMs (synchronous DRAM) to RDRAMs. By the year 2001, the RDRAM market is expected to grow to US$13.5 billion, for a 50% share of the main memory market. ... John