Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (29253)	9/7/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: RTev	Respond to of 74651

The tying argument has already been lost in the last Appeals overturn of Jackson. That concerned the interpretation of the '95 consent decree. They are now revisiting the issue under the new evidence introduced at the trial. The tying argument has not (yet)been addressed in this context by the appeals court.

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (29253)	9/8/1999 2:57:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

To All: The IMF is now telling the US that its stock prices are too high. This has got to be the ultimate irony in bureaucratic meddling. We fund these pukes and they turn around and tell us that our stock market is doing too well. AG and his cabal are bad enough but this is the limit. As if the US investor wasn't a little more savvy than the IMF. Why don't we go to the Fed and the IMF and ask them if they will invest our money for us. When did these jerks become money managers. JFD