To: StockDung who wrote (7257 ) 9/8/1999 5:04:00 PM From: THOMAS GOODRICH Respond to of 8858
flodyie, All of this *BS* from LVC's gamblingmagazine.com is getting a little stale at this point. Virtually everything Las Vegas Casinos, Claude Levy et. al writes daily via their publication gamblingmagazine.com is a childish response to having been terminated by Starnet for numerous plausible reasons including tortious acts. Quite frankly I would enjoy very much seeing this group follow through in suing Starnet because it would only exemplify how pathetically stupid this whole affair is and the fact Starnet will not even have to prove guilt by association. What is apparent from the Canadian Search & Seizure Warrant is that LVC may actually have triggered the inquiry into Starnet's operations, the result of their own in accepting Canadian wagers via their own merchant account and not Starnet's. You must be getting an orgasmic high serving as their daily conduit. Many investors are not aware Starnet for the most part doesn't need the pari-mutuel business anyway as their core business is sports wagering and casino gaming. Supposed loss of a jockey club is of no material significance, neither would be resignation of Mark Dohlen. Starnet, for the most part is a very sound organization and unless it shuts down, lots of money is going to be generated. That's a given, trust me! Any potential adverse outcome with Starnet will reflect very negatively on the whole prospect of gambling via the Internet and there likely will be many casualties such as CRY, SBET, GAMM, GGNC, CSIN and most definitely VGAMD. Last but not least, Las Vegas Casinos will be sitting high and dry without an engine because no one's going to want to risk having their business. Sometimes one would wonder what solar system this outfit is part of!