SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Craig Richards who wrote (25227)9/8/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Craig, i admit you have a point there...however, this doesn't change the fact that p/e expansion has vastly outpaced earnings growth in recent years and this is especially true of the tech sector. a more meaningful way of looking at this may be to single out the big cap tech names like MSFT,INTC,LU,CSCO, etc. and look at hoe their p/e expansion in recent years compares to their earnings growth over the same time span. without being able to quote exact figures, i think it is no stretch to assert that the current p/e's of these companies are extremely lofty. it is highly unusual to find such high p/e's at this point of the economic cycle. in a recession, yes. anyway, eventually valuations will adjust to fundamentals, they always do in the long run.
btw, thanks for posting these interesting statistics...20 companies with p/e's>1000? presumably the mania darlings...

regards,

hb



To: Craig Richards who wrote (25227)9/8/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Follies  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
, I think the "average P/E =
140" statistic you referred to is not meaningful.


I agree, the median may be an improvement, but I think the best measurement would be the total of all the market caps divided by all the total of all the earnings. Anyone have that info??



To: Craig Richards who wrote (25227)9/8/1999 2:33:00 PM
From: Paxb2u  Respond to of 99985
 
Craig.

It may mean somthing if you can some how factor in those 2,000 + companies that apparently are loosing money. ( Are those the companies that don't have a PE >0 ??)

Thanks, Peter :o)



To: Craig Richards who wrote (25227)9/8/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Matthew L. Jones  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
OK, how about the S&P 500 historical P/E:

decisionpoint.com

If this doesn't get your attention, nothing will.

MLJ