SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Thermal Control Technologies Corp TCT (was Redux Energy) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: M. Merriam who wrote (985)9/8/1999 10:02:00 PM
From: Nathan Hansen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1208
 
I think that this is a case of "either/or". There are cases for both. To my understanding it is then in the hands of the debenture holders to decide solvency issues.



To: M. Merriam who wrote (985)9/8/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: Edward W. Richmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1208
 
Mike, I just checked in one of my textbooks. I believe I was correct. It states that a debenture is a corporate bond that is not secured by specific property. If the issuer is liquidated, the debenture holder becomes a general creditor. The higher risk usually requires higher interest rates than those on secured debt. My take is that the non-payment of debenture interest does not result in default, whereas non-payment on a secured bond is game over.
Regards, Ed