Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD/INTC/RMBS et ALL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (24)	9/8/1999 9:53:00 PM
From: kash johal	Respond to of 271

dan, Re:"Could Intel do this right after they told everyone at IDF that there would be no PC133 support (except for MTH) till Q1 of 2000 a week or so ago?" My suspicion is that this will be a last minute descision. If enough DRDRAM is available then they may well delay the PC133 a couple of months. But if yields/volumes on DRDRAM are poor and their is a supply mismatch then i expect them to pull out the PC133. Just my thoughts. Just because Intel is manufacturing PC133 MB's may not mean diddly for Q4. I just wish everybody was being more open about all this crap frankly. It'll be us small investors who get screwed either way. regards, Kash

To: Dan3 who wrote (24)	9/8/1999 11:22:00 PM
From: grok	Respond to of 271

RE: <Re: Bad news for RDRAM if this is true Could Intel do this right after they told everyone at IDF that there would be no PC133 support (except for MTH) till Q1 of 2000 a week or so ago? Dan> The Register does really say that this mobo doesn't use MTH. I think it may.