Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (54934)	9/9/1999 9:31:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

The Cavalry is a valid concern based on their correspondence for posting to this thread. Who are they? Their posts should be archived for easy accessibility. The Cavalry information does not act as an attempt at diversion. As I review the e-mail threads and know what is really being said behind the scenes which does not reflect what was posted on the public threads, more disclosure is worthwhile to all investors. Individuals taking a micro viewpoint to this instead of the macro continue to fail to recognize what really happened here. As Riley was advised during our phone conversations and I have already posted here on numerous occasions, I believe I spoke to Mork no more than 2 times in my life (max would be 3 without a doubt)and only did so after Pugs kept his push on. To even suggest daily contact is a complete falsehood. Mork was never important in the big picture of RMIL. It was Morgan, Financials and the SEC... I do not believe smartin was ever in contact. I do not know for sure. Kugler certainly was never in daily contact or anything that would even remotely resemble that accusation. To: TopCat who wrote (54933) From: tonto Thursday, Sep 9 1999 7:02AM ET Reply # of 54934 The Cavalry supposedly was a group from the west who had lots of buying power and shares. Many of their e-mails were posted on the RMIL thread. It was BS. Their names should be provided to the SEC as well as at the RMIL activist site. It is in the interest of investors that this be done. Considering what they posted helped lead investors to believe differently than the facts presented on this thread, they should not be protected. --------------------------------------------------------------- My Comments: It appears that Tonto is trying to uncover who the Cavalry is for Kugler and others, and in the mean time try to apply pressure to drive an even bigger spike into the shareholders of RMIL. The SEC NEVER asked my who the Cavalry was or is during my testimony. The SEC was interested in the RMIL BOD's and if I ever received or agreed to recessive any benefit for talking about RMIL (the answer was and is NO I was not.) The reason I believe for these latest RANTS from the RMIL nays is to deflect the heat from the latest MORK scandal were he tried to get me to work for him (MONEY) to promote his public company on the internet message boards and chat rooms. You see, Morks action of trying to recruit places direct heat and a shadow of doubt upon Tonto, Kugler, S Martin and others that had daily contact with MORK in the RMIL scam. If MORK tried to recruit me, then Mork may have tried to, and may have recruited those to bash the stocks that he is or was short in, and even work to get them halted for his own personal gain! This is something that they (bashers) always fail to bring to light. I believe you can see a direct relationship from when I disclosed what Mork tried to do, with the much increased posts on Silicon Investor regarding RMIL and certain shareholders. Yes my friend, its called a diversion.<ggg>

To: tonto who wrote (54934)	9/9/1999 10:53:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

"The SEC NEVER asked my who the Cavalry was or is during my testimony. " Riley, If you're now trying to be honest and helpful to the SEC as you pretend, then you should have volunteered that information. But since the cavalry was most probably a figment of your imagination, it is easy to understand how you would not have wanted to let that cat out of the bag. The use of an imaginary group of "investors" who were buying RMIL heavily and who were willing to "take action" against those who thwarted them was a form of intimidation. The SEC does not take kindly to manipulation by intimidation. Reply to Post #833, Raging Bull, RMIL by Riley+G.