Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (71531)	9/9/1999 6:59:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574177

Elmer - <In raw performance these two improvements should add an increase of approximately 15 to 25% to Coppermine Pentium III CPUs versus current Pentium IIIs when running at identical MHz levels. " If true, this would move the Coppermine well ahead of the MIAthlon in integer performance and very close in FP. Funny, I remember someone mentioning that a few weeks back....> Interesting. Thanks. PB

To: Elmer who wrote (71531)	9/9/1999 7:01:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574177

Elmer, Re:"In raw performance these two improvements should add an increase of approximately 15 to 25% to Coppermine Pentium III CPUs versus current Pentium IIIs when running at identical MHz levels. " If true, this would move the Coppermine well ahead of the MIAthlon in integer performance and very close in FP." Great FUD, Elmer. Sure going to 133 FSB, and 64K L1 cache is goint to generate 15-25% improvement. Sure can't wait for those benchmarks can you old boy. Well neither can we. regards, Kash