SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zsteve who wrote (67444)9/9/1999 6:33:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
zs, Intel has always been trying to scam and bribe Rambus into a real product, while Dell and the other OEMs seem to have a problem with a memory chip that costs more but runs slower. <g>



To: zsteve who wrote (67444)9/9/1999 6:37:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Good articles from very opinionated commentator McComas (you probably don't have to imagine what the Rambus bulls think of him over on their thread). Even with a grain of salt, these and others by McComas (all on inqst.com) indicate erstwhile threadmate Earlie's (hope he returns sometime soon..) longtime Rambus thesis remains pretty strong: while RMBS stock is valued as if all PC's were badly constrained by memory bandwidth, any bottleneck that currently exists in your PC from DRAM likely is latency-related. RDRAM does not offer any latency advantage to which I am privy, Samsung's whitewash.. er, white paper notwithstanding. -mb