To: Alex who wrote (40163 ) 9/9/1999 7:13:00 PM From: goldsnow Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116796
China's long march to WTO ends in triumph By Brendan Pearson, Auckland The United States and China are expected to clinch a deal in Auckland this weekend on China's long-awaited entry to the World Trade Organisation. Negotiations on the controversial deal resumed in earnest in the margins of the APEC Ministerial Meeting in Auckland yesterday, with a round of bilateral meetings last night between US Trade Representative Ms Charlene Barshefsky, US Commerce Secretary Mr William Daley and China's Minister for Foreign Economic Co-operation, Mr Shi Guangsheng. The efforts are aimed at resolving a handful of outstanding issues to enable US President Bill Clinton and President Jiang Zemin to announce in-principle agreement on the terms of China's entry to the global trade body when they meet in Auckland on Sunday. China first applied for entry to the WTO's predecessor, the GATT, in 1986. New Zealand's Minister for Trade, Dr Lockwood Smith, said yesterday that the APEC ministerial communique to be issued later today would include strong and unanimous endorsement for China and Taiwan's entry to the WTO as soon as possible. Negotiations on China's accession restarted in Beijing with a "technical review" earlier this week, after being suspended in May after the bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. A renewed sense of urgency surrounds the negotiations, with less than two months remaining before the launch of global trade negotiations in Seattle in late November. Trade experts have indicated that early conclusion of China's negotiations with the US and the European Union is necessary to ensure there is sufficient time to conclude remaining protocols before the Seattle WTO summit. In addition to the ministerial-level talks, negotiations also resumed at the detailed working level yesterday between US negotiator Mr Robert Cassidy and his Chinese counterpart, Mr Long Yongtu. While Ms Barshefsky and Mr Daley stressed that a number of issues remained outstanding, sources suggested the US was unlikely to insist on major improvements to the Chinese offer tabled in April during Chinese Premier's Zhu Ronghi's visit to the US. After more than three hours of talks with Mr Shi yesterday, Ms Barshefsky said the US reiterated its hope of bringing China into the 134-member trade body on "commercially meaningful terms". "Minister Shi and I agreed to work jointly to resolve outstanding issues as soon as possible, recognising, however, that these issues that are outstanding must be resolved on a mutually satisfactory basis," Ms Barshefsky said. A recent study by the US International Trade Commission found that, if implemented, the concessions in China's current offer would see growth of 14 per cent in China's imports, 12 per cent growth in exports and provide a 4 per cent boost to China's GDP. Australia's Trade Minister, Mr Mark Vaile, who met his Chinese counterpart on Wednesday, said yesterday the Chinese were "desperately keen" to complete the negotiations as soon as possible. This follows the recent release of figures that show foreign investment in China dropped by 10 per cent in the first seven months of this year. Contracted foreign investment, seen as a key indicator of future inflows, fell 20.5 per cent in the first seven months of 1999. Canberra sources have been privately critical of the failure of the US to accept China's offer in April. Canberra agreed to terms with China during former trade minister Mr Tim Fischer's visit to Beijing in mid-May. Washington-based trade experts have blamed domestic political considerations, rather than the quality of the proposal, for President Clinton's rejection of the offer. In a recent study, Mr Daniel Rosen of the Institute of International Economics, said implementation of China's concessions would spur an increase in exports of $US 21.3 billion, including more than $3 billion from the US alone. "The US must recognise its own clear interest in Chinese accession. In light of these interests, the three remaining demands indefinite protection for US textiles and apparel producers, indefinite extension of non-market economy status for dumping actions, and indefinite application of a less liberal import surge protection mechanism look particularly foolish," Mr Rosen said. Mr Daley said yesterday some improvements to the April package would be necessary in order to appease US lawmakers. "In order for it to pass Congress, it has to be the right deal," he said. Congress will not formally ratify China's WTO entry, but will need to amend the 1974 Trade Act to grant Beijing permanent most-favoured-nation status, which it now enjoys only after an annual presidential waiver.afr.com.au