Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (59693)	9/10/1999 10:15:00 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

That she was offered the job by W and wants it is much more plausible than her "I just want to be Governor" explanation for not running for the Senate. Kind of an inelegant sentence but to hell with it.

To: Bill who wrote (59693)	9/10/1999 10:25:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

>>Then Christy Todd Whitman would seem to be the proper VP choice for you. For me too. You are joshing us. Biggest mistake Bush (assuming) could make. Huge. She's not popular even in her home state and has no charisma. Her victories are better termed "near defeats", she ran against an incredibly unpopular incumbent and then an unknown and both times she could not achieve even a bare majority! She has governed as a Rockefeller Rep liberal and appointed the worst judges. Whitman just dropped out of the Senate race as a sure loser (w/ Bob Grant in there). Her choice by Bush would guarantee a major schism with an invigorated Buchanan effort - the worst possible scenario for any Rep. Whitman is all negatives and absolutely no positives.