Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (5133)	9/10/1999 9:57:00 AM
From: ToolManInc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

rich4eagle...seen this yet? capitolhillblue.com

To: Bill who wrote (5133)	9/10/1999 1:58:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

re: A few of those Clinton accusations are probably not true. Yep, here is one - When American bomb makers began visiting China in 1979, they were startled by increasingly pointed questions that suggested their Chinese peers were hot on the trail of the secret to building a modern nuclear arsenal. It allows H-bombs to be made so small that many can fit atop a single missile or be fired from trucks, submarines and other mobile platforms. China succeeded on Sept. 25, 1992, the news coming from a spy who told his American handlers that Beijing had exploded a bomb based on the miniaturization secret. nytimes.com

To: Bill who wrote (5133)	9/11/1999 12:41:00 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I assure you the omission of perjury and obstruction of justice was a minor oversight. You should note that I did say "and many, many more things". You didn't really expect me to list every crime he's ever committed, did you. After all, we probably don't even know all the crimes he and Hillary are guilty of. I didn't mention the savings and loan frauds either, did I -- BTW, it's mighty curious you didn't point this out. But that curiousity can be explained by your first paragraph. in which you claim that some of the things I attributed to the Clinton's are probably not true. You have just revealed yourself as a liberal Clintonista propagandist! You know very well that all of the things I've written about the Clinton's are true and don't try to deny it. All of these charges have been made by respected, truth-telling conservative publications like the American Spectator, by respected Republican Congressional leaders like Bob Barr and Newt Gingrich and Henry Hyde, and by conservative figures known for their unswerving devotion to the Truth (with a capital T) like Rush Limbaugh and Matt Drudge. Here's something else that curious - in your defense of the Clinton's, you claimed that "a few of those Clinton accusations are probably not true". I notice you didn't mention which accusations you claim aren't true. Hmmmmmmm, could that be because you can't successfully argue that any of them aren't true? On a personal note, I and my wife are boomers too. We went to college in the early 70's and neither of us broke a single drug law. And except for minor traffic violations, I can't think of any laws I've broken. Well, maybe fishing and hunting without a license some. Now will you answer the question about whether you've recreated recently with cocaine? Come on, you can't be locked up for it, right? I also know of at least one person now behind bars who was never arrested for anything but possession. I'm pretty sure there are others. You're right about one thing - police don't raid college dorm parties or booze cruises like they do inner city neighborhoods. Frankly, that's a shame. "Recreational" users like yourself aren't a damn bit better than the dealers and "habitual" users who do get arrested and jailed. You don't commit other crimes to fund your buys? So what. You support the destructive industry with your money.