Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: w2j2 who wrote (24034)	9/10/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: ShamukE	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 29386

THIS IS DIRECTED AT THE WSJ NOT TO POSTER #24034 This deal was made known as soon as it occurred. I'm quite certain that it has been kicked around more than an old soccer ball. PLEASE!!! What criteria was used in publishing this story at this time. It's old news!!! Hasn't the author of this article heard it prior to today??? I was always under the impression that the WSJ journalists were well read. CAN I HAVE BEEN SO WRONG FOR SO LONG??? I'm certain that others are asking the same question. If the WSJ would respond I'm positive that many people would be interested. Thanks in advance.

To: w2j2 who wrote (24034)	9/10/1999 10:33:00 AM
From: George Dawson	Respond to of 29386

Walter, In the field of journalism - "legitimate" covers a lot of ground. An analysis of the article from the perspective of the rhetoric used indicates to me that it is flawed as several levels. Like many of these articles where sources are quoted and there is no conflict of interest disclosure - problems at that level are unknown. From my perspective as a speculative investor in Ancor - I agree with Herb, there are no surprises. I also agree with you - the Sun deal was a good one for Ancor and one of the factors in my previous assessment that, the risk of my Ancor investment is the lowest it has been in 3+ years. George