SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gc who wrote (40365)9/10/1999 1:32:00 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Hey GC, I have been reading about what you believe

you dont seem to be connecting here.. we are not too interested in your emotionally based beliefs.. we would like to hear substance not emotion, evidence not guesswork, details not sweeping nothings.. after hearing substantive information, we can objectively and maturely discuss for the purpose of evaluation and debate

but your comments are much like a nerd entering a party who walks up to a nice girl and says "you are a bitch" then turns to find a beer

anyone walking into the Chicago garage after the St Valentine Day massacre in the 1930's would be aghast at what he/she saw.. but seeing bloody bodies doesnt mean more people will be killed.. nobody else died after the witnesses arrived.. QCOM stock took a hard fall from 190 to 160, sure.. but that is over.. it sounds like you are responding emotionally to the fall that already happened.. a base is building stronger by the day

90% of all emotionally based decisions in the stock market result in losses.. that has been what I have learned in 20 years of experience.. your comments and beliefs seem to be based on emotion, therefore you appear like a contrary indicator at best, and a moron at worst

what do you see objectively, not selectively?
what price action do you expect will precede this decline?
price action almost always warns the experts

I challenge your intellect, and wonder if it is operating
/ jim



To: gc who wrote (40365)9/10/1999 10:59:00 PM
From: MileHigh  Respond to of 152472
 
You haven't responded to my questions now have you? Another stupid post...Do I need to post the question again? LOL!!

MileHigh