Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yankee Trader who wrote (796)	9/10/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2484

Everyone is always looking for "the next Intel", etc. Probably not that, but we may just have found a true penny stock that has a truly viable technology that turns it into a real money-making machine which does have the potential to go up exponentially and split several times over the next few years. If so, that is how the few brave (or stubborn, or ignorant, or smart depending on your view) people became very wealthy on a relatively few shares of DELL, Wal-Mart, Intel, MSFT, Home Depot, etc -- the list goes on and on. Here's to the ultimate find! I bought this about the same time as I bought IFOS (another one I have high hopes for). Also bought several penny losers, but it only takes one to turn into a company!!! I remain, SOROS ps too tired to post much lately. will entertain again someday I hope

To: Yankee Trader who wrote (796)	9/11/1999 4:35:00 AM
From: bud	Respond to of 2484

good job yankee

To: Yankee Trader who wrote (796)	9/11/1999 3:30:00 PM
From: chaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2484

FTI Yankee Trader, I'm a retired guy with a long history in high tech marketing situations....with some successes in the stock market, and a couple of singed feathers to recall all too well. If you think I'm ranting, well....everyone is quite welcome to an opinion. As to not calling Molex, you are quite incorrect. I do not consider myself to be an unreasoning person, but I will concede that my journalism training requires that I double check, from at least two unconnected sources, all that I am told. So far, with regard to LUMM, that has not been possible. Thus, my view of this company as an investment worthy of my capital is still wanting of proof. Please do not "flame" me, or others for that matter, simply because our views differ. If I post something that is incorrect, I would like to have it pointed out in a gentlemanly manner, as I have responded to you. As I have said, when I hear from Molex, I will report to the thread. I shall also report if I do not.