Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INTERNET ASIA + Indexes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: strtrset who wrote (1252)	9/12/1999 12:57:00 PM
From: Francois Goelo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1567

"Morally Correct", they're certainly not........ What gets me with the Short Selling Bashers (SSB's for Short...) is the Bashing part... ZICA had a great run and is at a price it should be several months from now, IMO... Why not state: "the stock has run ahead of itself, therefore, as Short Sellers, we believe it represents a great shorting opportunity, end of the story and the stock folds back some 30%, where it probably belongs... But SSB's are not happy with that, as they want to drive it into the ground, hence the Dirt Searching or Inventing if it can't be found... In other words and IMO, there is no need to bash, unless, of course, it's an ingrained character trait... You only need to post a Disclaimer if you are compensated by the Company, which is not the case, I believe... I also often put a short Disclaimer when I discuss the future value of a stock, so that Newbies understand I have a vested interest and I am a Biased Long... Regards, F. Goelo + + +