SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: engineer who wrote (1436)9/12/1999 2:36:00 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
Two questions about Q's royalty fee structure:

1. I read that Q gets a % of the "manufacturing price" of a CDMA phone. The % varies depending on who is the manufacturer and who makes the CDMA chips in the phone. Does this mean that as the ASP of the phone drops, the royalty fee per phone will also drop proportionately, or is there a fixed minimum royalty fee per phone regardless of ASP.

2. How is ASP determined if the mobile phone is part of a device, perhaps only a small part. For example, the pdQ integrates a Palm Pilot along with the phone. The Palm Pilot by itself sells for more than the phone. If somebody else integrates a CDMA phone within, say, a laptop or palmtop, how are royalty fees determined?



To: engineer who wrote (1436)9/12/1999 11:15:00 PM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
Samsung has long been in China selling CDMA basestations.

engineer, I don't understand what you could mean by this. Has China, or Great Wall or Unicom been buying CDMA basestations, even in the absence (before Spring 1999) of any intention, or authority from MII, to build out a CDMA wireless network?

Welcome back from Europe.

Regards. Steve