SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Lloyd who wrote (67626)9/13/1999 5:19:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Don, True enough that stocks have lower commissions than options for most people, including me. However, in one case, you are playing long stock, short call, short put, while in the other, you are just shorting two puts. So, you have already paid commish on two options in either set up. Whatever you pay for the stock, assuming it is not zero, is extra commission for the less efficient position.

Another point is that the cash you are not wasting on long stock earns interest.

And, also important, every security has friction costs. So, if you play 3 different security classes for a position that only requires two, you are getting wacked by three spreads instead of two.



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (67626)9/14/1999 1:02:00 AM
From: PaperChase  Respond to of 132070
 
>> Buying stock and selling a call is basically shorting a put and holding cash. <<

True but the latter almost always requires approval from ones broker for advance level of options trading. Not everybody can qualify (liquidity, net worth, etc) for this advance level so the only way they can play is to pay for 2 transactions, 1 to buy the stock plus 1 to sell the call.