Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD/INTC/RMBS et ALL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (48)	9/13/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: grok	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 271

RE: <Just saw this review: gotapex.com shows camino/drdram performance sucks.> This with Tom and Dell Bellmarks makes 3 out of 3 for sdram. How can it be???? NAP mode? Maybe. Did you notice that in this review it is reported that the Camino system pages more often? What could cause that? I just can't think of any good reason. If it is a bad reason then the poor Rambus performance could just disappear some day when the latest Camino, or drivers, or ??? gets supplied. Remember the early reports of bad K7 FP? I'm still wondering how the Dell Bellmarks got presentated. Isn't Dell covered under the Camino embargo? I bet that Intel was all over Bell afterwards.