Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CDN. MOMO PUPPIES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John who wrote (7553)	9/13/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: stuffbug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36688

As I understand it, INB only gets paid if the company to whom they sold the gaming contracts actually generates revenue from the contracts. In addition, I think that INB still owns the physical machines (i.e. only the revenue sharing contracts between INB and the tribes were sold). Thus, if the Indians can run gaming operations, INB will get paid for the contracts, INB won't have to write off the asset value of the gaming machines, and INB could possibly enter into new gaming contracts directly with other tribes. You may want to scroll through the INB thread to check my understanding of the situation. In any event, the stock appears to have been under accumulation over the last six months and I have never been able to determine the reason for the stock's gyrations over the last few years (it seems that pertinent information only ever comes to light after the stock has made a major move).