SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (60044)9/13/1999 5:33:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
It's not vague at all. And it doesn't say certain rights. It implies ALL rights not otherwise reserved to the states or Federal government are retained by the people.



To: Neocon who wrote (60044)9/13/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
From the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798. The authors are Thomas Jefferson and James Madison:

Resolved, that the several States composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that by compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes, delegated to that government definite powers, reserving each state to itself, the residuary masses of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party; that this government, created by this compact, was not made the exclusive or final judge to the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers, but that, as in all other cases of compact among parties having no common judge for itself...each party has equal right to judge for itself.



To: Neocon who wrote (60044)9/13/1999 6:15:00 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<All it mentions is that the states and people retain certain rights not enumerated in the Constitution. >>

Your president says that anything not enumerated to the people or states belongs to the feds. Kind of a flip since he was a gov.