Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RoseCampion who wrote (40734)	9/13/1999 7:26:00 PM
From: Don Edgerton	Respond to of 152472

Whatever the information to be dispensed at the analysts' conference, we ought to be there. That way we can make our on interpretation. I've just sent a note to Q asking for a live web cast (of IJ remarks at a minimum). If any others want to chime in the address is www-ir@qualcomm.com Aloha

To: RoseCampion who wrote (40734)	9/13/1999 7:47:00 PM
From: Labrador	Respond to of 152472

>>(PS: Full disclosure - took today as an opportunity for some tax positioning...sold most Q shares in my non-retirement account, then bought immediately into equivalent position in deep-in-the-money Jan2001 LEAPS calls. << Why pay the tax?

To: RoseCampion who wrote (40734)	9/13/1999 9:33:00 PM
From: RoseCampion	Respond to of 152472

(OT) Island to extend trading hours by nearly 3 hours beginning September 15th (this Wednesday) Looks like our stock-watching fun is, after many false starts, finally going to get a bit lengthier: Island, majority owned by No. 4 Internet broker Datek Online Holdings Inc., said in a statement it would start offering trading from 8 a.m. EDT (1200 GMT) to 8 p.m. EDT (0000 GMT) on Sept. 15... biz.yahoo.com Also check out, if you haven't tried it, the "Island viewer" at: isld.com -Rose-

To: RoseCampion who wrote (40734)	9/13/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: Rick	Respond to of 152472

"This could be very negative .... "But he also pointed to a 'bull side of the story'" This sounds like an old fashioned "two handed" story. You know, "on the one hand the Dow may hit 40,000, but on the other hand it could hit 100." If you cover all possible outcomes how can you possibility go wrong? But if there's no possibility of being wrong your not really taking a stand. I've found that such arguments usually are a sure sign the speaker knows nothing significant about the subject. Fred