Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gc who wrote (40747)	9/13/1999 9:21:00 PM
From: waverider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

>>>You just want to shot up my mouth.<<< Huh? >>>BTW, I do not want to see you or anyone lose money. That's why I am giving you warnings.<<< Oh, thank you, thank you!!!!! >>>I am not sure how low this thing could go. But, most likely, it will go lower. Of course, I could be wrong even with my honest opinion.<<< Ah, you are getting good. I think the spin department at the White House has a position for you. Rick <H>

To: gc who wrote (40747)	9/13/1999 9:31:00 PM
From: Ruffian	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

gc, Did you ever watch the Gong Show? If so, what is the best part of the show? Next Time you post I will show you my favorite part! <gg> Mp

To: gc who wrote (40747)	9/13/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

gc, I sincerely appreciate your concern, and that is not sarcasm. Looking at Q's graph, it appears to be at an unrealistic level from where it was at the beginning of the year. You are not alone in that observation; there are highly paid professional analysts who have come to the same conclusion and made the point that it is over bought, over extended, and risky. However, I choose to keep my hard earned investment capital in Q and accept this risk for a number of reasons: Since I began purchasing Q in April, I have a very large profit to buffer me against the short term swings. I think comparisons to Q's stock price early this year are invalid; they are a much different company now that they have shed the infrastructure business and won the legal battle with Ericsson, and their pro forma income supports that contention. Q's patent position on cdma seems to be unassailable. The adoption rate of cdma has reached Tornado proportions. This means there will be an ever growing licensing revenue stream coming to Q. Q has a fabless IC business that is generating excellent margins and is technically advanced over the competition. It is for these reasons, which I re-examine in light of news every day, that I continue to stay fully invested in Q. I hope you will see that my position is well thought out. I will continue to stay alert for any news that indicates Q's fundamentals are deteriorating, as that would influence my decision. Best of luck in your investing, Frank