Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris L. who wrote (4580)	9/13/1999 10:16:00 PM
From: LOR	Respond to of 8117

TO ALL "INSIDERS" AND " OUTSIDERS TRYING TO LOOK IN" Well folks, you know I can't stay away from this forum for to long ..... and you know how I always play "Devil's Advocate" .... so here goes: Q1) What kind of company would sign a <<Performance>> Distribution Agreement without some kind of guaranteed <<Production Availability Schedule>> ? Q2) How can PYNG negotiate additional Distribution Agreements [ especially performance based ones ] WITHOUT having a darn good idea of the FAST-1 min/max production capacity they can achieve over the next 12 / 24 months? Q3) If PYNG does have a better handle on their production capacity over the next 12 / 24 months [ and I believe this is very highly likely ] then why in heavens name can't they tell us in a PR or forum message? At this stage I would NOT accept the argument that: "Pyng is afraid of providing bogus production capacity estimates out of fear of repeating PYNG's negative situation spawned by past << overly optimistic >> sales projections". Of course there can be other reasons for withholding such estimates .... maybe some of those reasons are even valid from a "private shareholder's" perspective. However, I am having trouble determining what they might be. LOR P.S.- This is an OPEN forum. I have learned much from it and have gained a personal appreciation of many of it's members some of whom I firmly intend to meet hopefully in the not to distant future. I for one have tried to contribute when I can to the PYNG knowledge base available to us all. We all have our own styles and sometimes we do allow our frustrations to get the better of us [ AND that applies to PYNG's CEO as well as myself and a number of other posters ]. While I may not agree with what certain posters have to say [ like Hotshot's most recent post ] it will be a frosty day in hell before I endorse the idea of running anyone PRO PYNG or CON PYNG off the forum or of ignoring them. I also agree that if you are challenged after making supposed errors in a post that you should either acknowledge that you goofed .... or come back with a counter argument ..... SO, in this case I am most interested in HOTSHOT's next post! Bon soir ....tout le monde [ especially ED ]