Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/13/1999 10:27:00 PM
From: Ruffian	Respond to of 152472

Simple, What did you base your conclusion on? Please don't tell me an 8-Ball, I have heard that one to much today. Regards, Mp

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/13/1999 10:44:00 PM
From: Kent Rattey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Go back to Amazon, sounds like they really respect you. "William, I'm looking for KISSYPUTS&CALLS have you seen him or her today? I noticed he or she has posted on another thread today, but did not want to make him or her look like a little liar by confronting him on another thread. Do you know he has not sent a thing to me! I can't believe the nerve some people have by saying one thing and not coming through with what they promised! One thing about it at least he is not posting on this thread lately, so maybe the thread owes me for keeping he or she at bay! Hank"

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/13/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: McNabb Brothers	Respond to of 152472

Hey KISSYPUTS&CALLS, There you are, how about the faxes you promised me? My fax line is free and the number is (870)-892-1151! Put up or shut up, for you are the one that made the promise! Hank

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/14/1999 12:42:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I thought the whole Schwab 500 trading team thing conclusively established that you are sort of like Bill Clinton in the "fibbing" department. Why do you expect us to take you seriously ? Jon.

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/14/1999 12:50:00 AM
From: waverider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Whoa! You are so good. Can I give you all my money to invest? Good Grief! The stock was over extended. It corrected. You got lucky. Now go back under your rock. Rick <H>

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/14/1999 1:58:00 AM
From: 10K a day	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Kissy,,,When will this one hit 120?

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/14/1999 2:41:00 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

You've been warned! Hey, Gang, didja ever notice that people like this come out from under rocks every time a stock drops. I have never been on a thread on SI yet that hasn't had one of these jerks show up. They never give you reasons for their predictions, only a bald faced announcement, and a lot of crowing if they hit it right. As far as I can tell, it is the first time he has ever posted to this thread, and I hope it's the last!

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/14/1999 11:54:00 AM
From: R. Ramesh	Respond to of 152472

QCOM will preannounce an earnings shortfall before the end of the week. If you really love QCOM, you'll love it even more at $120. I also predicted QCOM would tank, exactly two days before it dropped 25 points. I had never made a prediction regarding QCOM previously, so its not as if I had been saying it would collapse for weeks and finally got lucky. You've been warned! The first part is clearly untrue based on this morning's press release. I somehow get the feeling that the second part is pure coincidence.

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (40767)	9/14/1999 11:59:00 AM
From: Labrador	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

>>QCOM will preannounce an earnings shortfall before the end of the week. If you really love QCOM, you'll love it even more at $120.<< With no evidence whatsoever to support your "predictions," it is a wonder that anyone listens to you. Maybe if you provided your analysis, or other empirical support, then you might have some creditability. But a "prediction" doesn't carry much weight on SI, so you should take the predictions to the Yahoo board. I am though looking for well-reasoned views, even if negative, as long as supportable. But no "predictions" please.