SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (232)9/14/1999 1:25:00 AM
From: High Grader  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 69300
 
Here is a thought for the evolutionists and others.

We each have two parents and they each have two parents and so on. Now if we allow 25 years for a generation and follow this progression, each of us alive had to have 2,4,8,16,32....and so on, ancestors. Do this for 10 generations (250 years and you had to have 512 ancestors.

Ok now keep going and after 33 generations you have 4294967296 ancestors, nearly 5 billion. That takes you back to the year 1200 or so. (That is nearly as many people as there are presently on the planet.)

Go back 2000 years or 25 generations and you had 604462909807315000000000
ancestors, for one person!!! Do a spreadsheet and see how it works for yourself.

Arguments about intermarriages and so forth are irrelevant as you had to have all these genetic donors to exist at this moment, regardless of who married whom.

This of course is a paradox, or flawed logic. It requires some solution, or is it true and history just a bunch of lies.

Any volunteers?



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (232)9/14/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: John B. Wilson  Respond to of 69300
 
<two kinds of people> Sure, you can put me into pitch #1,if you're into labels. Here's more:
Not Saabs, (Jags).
Not a shooter - been there, done that, had enough (USMC)- no sport in shooting, IMO.