Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: High Grader who wrote (268)	9/14/1999 11:45:00 AM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 69300

one generation before them you needed 16 progenitors, No, all it takes is that a few generations back your grandfather on your mother's side was the same person as your grandfather on your father's side. Happens all the time even in the best of families. TP

To: High Grader who wrote (268)	9/14/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: MikeH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

The mathematics of it are not quite correct. It is true that a 2^100 is a big number, but it is not logical that 2^100 is where your genes come from. Look at is this way. 4 generations ago, there were Abe, Betty, Craig and Debbie. Abe and Betty begat Ellen and Frank, Craig and Debbie begat Gary and Hellen. Frank and Hellen begat Kenny, while Ellan and Gary begat Linda Kenny and Linda begat you. Now, by permutation, we have 2^3 or 8 ancestors. But, as you can see from the example, only 4 ancestors were needed. This combination can be extended out indefinately. So our genes don't come from 2^n parents in the distant past. From what I've read, a population of 10,000 diverse humans could produce the genetic differentiation present in our current population, over 65 millenia.