Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (4236)	9/14/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: John Lawrence	Respond to of 5164

Thanks CK just so's people know, CK will be spending some money to get those documents, to say nothing of the gray cells he's going to burn trying to understand them

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (4236)	9/14/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: kidl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5164

I never thought I would say this but ... HATS OFF to you! BTW, I'd be happy to pick up part of the cost Rgds

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (4236)	9/14/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Respond to of 5164

Court Filing Summary: Sungold Gaming Inc. vs United Nation of Chippewa, Ottawa and Pottawatomi Indians of Mich, and a number of others. Eaton County Circuit Court PHONE: 1-517-543-7500 Case Number 99201CZ - Judge Kelvin E. Osterhaven. unicus.com unicus.com unicus.com (You can print these for your records) I should have the docs in a week or two. Give me a couple days to scan the docs and upload to this site. I am getting # 37 and # 39.

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (4236)	9/14/1999 9:30:00 PM
From: L. D.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5164

You are right Cheeky. This is indeed a public document. I, like many others I'm sure, will chip in and share the cost of obtaining these documents through appropriate channels. Seems to me Sungold's management still doesn't get it, do they ??? It's we shareholders who support this company and it's very difficult at times to understand their "shenanigans". Needless to say it would be only fair to accommodate shareholders needs and requests. Too bad this management has a very difficult time to change it's old ways and unfortunately it shows clearly in share price. It's beyond my comprehension why a public company such as Sungold would refuse a shareholder access to documents which can be easily obtained ( small cost attached ) from a public office down in USA. Smells to me like a very nasty and hard-nose-like attitude.