Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (11338)	9/14/1999 9:25:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Jack, I am not only puzzled by the Rh inquarts but it could make sense if indeed it is specific to Rh), I am much more puzzled by the implication that GPGI can separate the Rh from the rest (in preparing the inquarts). If they know how to get the Rh out, why do they need Sabin? Zeev

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (11338)	9/15/1999 2:38:00 AM
From: Scott Wheeler	Respond to of 14226

<<puzzled by the addition of an "inquart" to the "leaching process">> Jack, I was also puzzled by this and asked about it. Perhaps the term inquart is not fully apt, because the explanation given was that the use of the same metal was at least as much a collector as the conventional use of an inquart, or calibrator element. Technical specifics are beyond my ken, but the point is to use Rh to collect more of itself. How elemental Rh was achieved I don't know, but my guess is that Sabin would able to do this more efficiently (profitably). Global will use it as the [excellent metaphor, CL] sourdough starter (Global-refined or Sabin-refined) as CLP has indicated. All this is very intriguing to me...wouldn't you just loooove to be able to hop a time machine and take a peek ahead 24 months? moorlock Scott