Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Booney who wrote (381)	9/14/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: J-14	Respond to of 69300

Thank you. Although a bit much, your point came across clear as a bell.

To: Booney who wrote (381)	9/14/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

. Food for thought. Do you have sources? This looks like either hogwash or little conjectures from long ago when people did not have information. TP example: The moon has no erosion, but accumulates cosmic dust at a regular, measurable rate. Who measured the rate? This appears to be a wild assed guess or a worst case scenario. 54 feet of dust? There would be no features left on the moon, it would be a uniform blob of dust. This sounds more like the minimum resolution of the telescopes available in 1968 than an actual prediction. TP