Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ALL IN PAUL who wrote (2454)	9/15/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45639

atl seems to rely on defense, so winning by 7 might be tough. indy still needs to prove itself as real, and a victory of n.e. would convince me. i do like your jax pick, -10.5, seems very low. jags love to beat carolina since both teams are the same year expansion teams, and carolina has reverted to being an expansion team.

To: ALL IN PAUL who wrote (2454)	9/15/1999 12:40:00 AM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45639

Indy is one of my first-look favorites, too. Their OL was the best the Falcons faced last year, other than Denver. What you are missing about the Atlanta game is that Chris Chandler might not play. The Oregon Lottery had to post a line today. Vegas has not set a line yet. The Jags line also jumped out at me, but then I remembered the cardinal rule of football betting: always go with a double-digit home dog. Several things should be remembered about the Jags trouncing of the Niners. The score was 9-3 at one point in the 3rd quarter, the Niners aren't as good as their image, and Dom Capers has historically owned San Fran. I still might go with Jax, though. Tom