Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Truth about Waco -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: truedog who wrote (918)	9/15/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1449

TD; As much as I've looked at this I didn't know At the time few of us were aware that the FBI commander at Waco was Richard Rogers, the same man who had been in charge at Ruby Ridge. Rogers had been in command of an operation that went very sour. Here was a chance to do far more damage. Why let him command? What we didn't know was that Lon Horiuchi, the trigger man at Ruby Ridge, was also present at Waco. This puts things in a far more sinister perspective. Not only do we have the man who changed the rules of engagement from “return fire” to “shoot on sight," but we have with him, in a position of authority, armed with armed subordinates, West Point graduate Horiuchi, the man willing to carry out the “shoot on sight” order. from & the Guy who wrote it seems reputable. intellectualcapital.com it's inconceivable to me they put the same guy who shot an unarmed women with a baby in her arms right between the eyes in charge of the snipers at Waco. When I read that it made me sick, how can we trust a damm thing they do or say. Jim

To: truedog who wrote (918)	9/15/1999 9:19:00 AM
From: gao seng	Respond to of 1449

I heard on the radio Monday taht there is an FBI agent coming out saying that on the day of the fire he heard shots being fired from a sniper position. OT from a computer mag: The lead editorial in PC WEEK on May 24, 1999 started with: "We've lately had reason to wonder if our nation's cryptography policy is being made by fools. It is a mixed blessing to learn that the people in charge are merely liars." Of course, their conclusion assumes that our leaders cannot be both fools and liars.