Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (3573)	9/15/1999 9:18:00 AM
From: Bob Trocchi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Dan... >>Do you honestly think the stock would accommodate short sellers and open unchanged or down on that kind of news? << You raise three valid points and I agree that if they come true the stock should break out of their trading range on the upside. On the other hand, the three points you raise may not happen and in fact your #1, at this point will not happen. Now if the other 2 do not happen, do you agree that the stock will also break out of its trading range on the downside? I find this discussion very interesting and I have no position in GUMM but I lean to the short side over the long term, say 12 months from now. Good Luck to all Bob T.

To: DanZ who wrote (3573)	9/16/1999 7:23:00 AM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Dan- you waste your time with these sages....Must be nice to know everything.... Do you really care what Kevin, Dale or Bill really think?....They thrive on belittling and have said nothing of value regarding GUMM since you have monitored this thread. Wexler thinks it is a $1 stock but refused to take a personal bet on stock price or bottom line. His short so far is down nearly the dollar he is predicting GUMM to be worth ... Russell will continue to remind folks of the NEJM publication as if it were his personal victory and spread his derisive comments and predictions as if he knew anything. Kevin will belittle but obviously shot his wad in high school chemistry.... Arguing with these guys would only be of value if they knew anything about GUMM. They don't, but it won't stop them from proffering their opinions. It begs the question why anybody would pay attention to them....particularly you. Regards, Mike