Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (41223)	9/15/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: 16yearcycle	Respond to of 152472

That post is gone on my screen. I'd love to know what it was..

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (41223)	9/15/1999 4:11:00 PM
From: SpudFarmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Steve M.: My thanks also,...but wait, where did it go? Don't worry, you didn't put it on the wrong thread...or did you?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (41223)	9/15/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: quidditch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Uncle Frank, should have been a "." after revealing <gg>. As I posted on other thread, I don't believe Q's handset division can be valued on an enterprise basis--i.e., some multiple of sales or imputed earnings, IF the division is sold to an existing handset maker or subcontractor like Solectron (?). Adding sourcing and assembly lines to increase production/establish production of a Q line of phones seems more like an IPR transfer. JV or some other outsourcing probably makes more sense. engineer and vman probably would have a good handle as to whether an outright sale hinders creativity and value of the ASIC division and other CDMA related product divisions. Regards. Steve