Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (517)	9/15/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Tiger if Darwin's theory does not show evolution as you say then let us stop calling it that. it is not an evolution but simply a progression from one form to another. Just leave it at that. We can teach natural selection but you cannot leave mushy brains with the implication that that is how they were naturally selected because there is no proof of that. And you also need to teach mushy brains the differing points of view which I have previously enumerated ,http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=11259945 so they can come out with all points of view, TA Message #517 from TigerPaw at Sep 15 1999 4:26PM They are understandings Go re-read the posts, this is exactly what I have been saying. What you are confusing is the set of facts collectively known as evolution. These are the fossils and DNA chains which show that life on earth in the distant past is different from life of earth today. I can't help it if you insist to think that evolution is more than it is. The end point and understanding is Darwin's theory of Natural Selection and the later modifications. It is through the theory that we can tell why life changed over time. The theory of how and why is much more interesting than the fact that old lifeforms looked different. Darwin's theory is not evolution! Evolution is the accumulated evidence that life has modified (evolved). TP