To: w molloy who wrote (522 ) 9/15/1999 4:53:00 PM From: Tunica Albuginea Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
wmolloy, when you test theories you test them with pro data and con data. Why do the evolutionists insist on teaching only the pros and not the cons? How about allowing these cons to be taught in public schools and let the kids decide ?Darwin on Trial Phillip E. Johnson Synopsis In clear, concise chapters, Johnson offers a casual, reasoned and scientifically sound evaluation of the support for Darwinism--from fossil records to molecular biology. In a new afterword, he responds to his critics and their arguments. "Unquestionably the best critique of Darwinism I have ever read."--Michael Denton, author of Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution Michael J. Behe Synopsis Behe argues that the biochemical basis of complex life could not havedeveloped through gradual evolutionary change because too many dependent variables would have had to have been altered simultaneously. Through explanations of the functions of the eye, blood clotting, and the immune system, he sets out to argue against evolution as a sole explanation for their existence." (Libr J) Index. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis Michael Denton Synopsis "Following a brief historical analysis of the development of evolutionary theory, Denton draws on recent work in taxonomy, paleontology, and microbiology to argue that Darwin's views are no longer tenable. It is the evidence from microbiology and biochemistry, notably the studies of protein and amino acids sequences, that ultimately leads the author to reject evolution and claimthat each class of organism is isolated and unique." (Choice) Index. Darwin Retried: An Appeal to Reason Norman Macbeth Darwinism: A Time for Funerals Norman MacBeth The Face That Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution Hank Hanegraaff ------------------ TA you saidMessage #522 from w molloy at Sep 15 1999 4:44PM so why don't we change the basis of science to try to disprove a theory instead of changing it to fit there purposes Actually, 'science' does exactly this. Theories are tested all the time. It is a prime requirement for a theory to be testable. Newtons Gravitational theory is testable. Einstein's General and Special theories of relativity are testable. Creationist theory isn't. It's dogma. You believe it or you don't.