Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BSGrinder who wrote (67756)	9/15/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

bsg, in addition to that logic cramper is incapable of figuring out, he says this at all time highs... >>Wall Street isn't like Hollywood or baseball. You can't overexpose yourself. You can start every game with the semis.<< this guy is truly d-d-d-d-d-d-umb!

To: BSGrinder who wrote (67756)	9/15/1999 7:36:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

BSG, How anyone could give this guy a nickel of money to manage is beyond me. He should tattoo -66.6% on his forehead and call himself the anti-value. (g) Wayne

To: BSGrinder who wrote (67756)	9/15/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: james paterson	Respond to of 132070

BS, Unfortunately, Cramer is probably right about end of Q window dressing. Although, the MF mgrs that buy the dips will look pretty silly if they end up selling at large losses by the end of Q4. But then, what's new? It would be great if they managed to get the sox back up before AG does another increase on Oct. 5 & collapses them. In any event after this Q they are going to have some tough yr/yr comparisons & I'm hoping that reality will intrude into their hallucinatory worlds. James