To: Renamed who wrote (1854 ) 9/15/1999 8:46:00 PM From: Theo Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2118
Renamed, Normally I wouldn't have even noticed, but, your mentioning of a possible delay in BINGO start-up brought back to memory a post on RB last night concerning that very possibility. Last week I would've laughed at the absurdity of the suggestion...now, I'm not so sure. The poster typed in caps for whatever reason- Post by movingman:ragingbull.com SLEEP WELL, ALL FELLOW GAAY SHAREHOLDERS! for the following reasons! FIRST qbid shareholders will be asked to vote first, to the question of will they be in favor of the merger.THEY WILL ALL VOTE YES. SECONDLY, IT WILL THAN BE DECIDED BY US TO VOTE YES ALSO, UNDER THEIR TERMS OF SURRENDER! third, frank and fellow mgt. can't vote their shares! fourth, if we say no as a majority, each company, goes their seperate ways. IF THIS HAPPENS, YOU WILL SEE A BIG UPSWING IN THE PRICE OF GAAY. THE FINAL CHAPTER OF THIS STORY WILL BE THAT, THE BINGO TELEVISION GAME WILL BE AGAIN POSTPONED FOR ONE REASON OR THE OTHER. THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER THOUGH, IF THIS DOES HAPPEN IT WILL BE DONE FOR 1 REASON ONLY. TO ERODE ANY FAITH IN GAAY. THEY WILL USE IT AS A WAY TO CHANGE NO MERGER VOTES TO YES MERGER VOTES. THEY GAVE US THE FIRST REASON FOR THE DELAY. THEY MAY GIVE US A SECOND. THESE AGAIN CAN AND WILL BE PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW BY MY ATTORNEY FOR MYSELF AT THE LEAST. IF PUSH COMES TO SHOVE, I WILL ASK ALL INTERESTED SHAREHOLDERS TO BECOME A PART OF A CLASS ACTION LAW-SUIT. SOME OF YOU MAY QUESTION THE FACT THAT I SAY, THAT THE START OF THE BINGO TELEVISION GAME MIGHT BE DELAYED. HERE IS MY REASON, THE TIME FRAME. READ THE P.R.ON QBID. BETWEEN THE TIME OF THEIR VOTE AND OURS, BINGO T-V WILL HAVE BEEN ON FOR A FEW WEEKS AT LEAST. THEY KNOW FOR A FACT, THAT IF THE GAME IS A HUGH T-V HIT THAT WE WILL ALL SAY NO TO THE MERGER! I ASK YOU ALL, IS MY LOGIC. RIGHT OR WRONG? A bit of a stretch? Perhaps, still................