SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: w molloy who wrote (548)9/15/1999 6:33:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
wmolloy, look no question we are not challenging critical thinking in our high schoolers and are often feeding them
oatmeal.
My point is that the only commonly agreed upon point about evolution is that it is a controversial
especially the issue of evolution V. creation

So how are you supposed to teach a controversial subject? Well you teach all sides and you let the audience decide

Don't you think that is how it should be?

Here is just one small site that illustrates vividly how controversial this matter is:

home.wxs.nl

So my point: let's teach all this to kids; the earlier the better, because this is going to require a lot of time to study it

back much later

TA

you said

Message #548 from w molloy at Sep 15 1999 6:08PM

Tunica

you wrote I am not aware that Darwin's theory is being
tested in the classroom. I do not think this is emphasized enough , because
millions of children leave schools convinced beyond any doubt that we are
grandchildren of apes ,

An observation -
1. Evolutionary theory per se is badly taught at the high school level. One can hardly teach the cons if the pros aren't understood.
2. Testing in the classroom? You are joking, right? Would you ask a 12 year old about TA of QCOM charts?

Do you accept my point is that the theory IS being tested - something you said wasn't being done.

Additional OT observations
2. The teaching of critical thinking in the US, quite frankly stinks.
3. The standard of primary and secondary school teaching in the US also stinks.

We are not the grandchildren of apes - we are apes. How do you explain the 99.9% similarity we have with Bonobo Chimps?

w.



To: w molloy who wrote (548)9/15/1999 6:47:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
> How do you explain the 99.9%
similarity we have with Bonobo Chimps?<

I hear that 99.9% figure get bandied about and I must admit it bugs me. 99.9% by what criteria? All you have to do is take a look at a Bonobo and an H.Sap and they're way different species. It makes the 99.9% number quite counterintuitive.

Are you saying that with a 0.1% change I too can get laid 24/7? lol