SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Herschel Rubin who wrote (3999)9/15/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Gary Korn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10027
 
Here is an earlier post on this thread regarding volumes in Q1, Q2 and Q3 (half-way). We clearly are ahead of Q1 in volvume. So how can Q3 come in less than .34?

Message 11002798

Volume comparison:

NASDAQ:
Q199 - 59,162,000,000 (61 trading days)
Q299 - 61,628,000,000 (63 trading days)
Q399 - 30,985,0000,000 (32 of 64 trading days, so half-way)

NYSE:
Q199 - 48,786,000,000
Q299 - 49,652,000,000
Q399 - 23,342,000,000 (half-way)

OTCBB:
Q199 - 14,847,000,000
Q299 - 25,514,000,000
Q399 - 9,300,000,000 (half-way)

*1998*:
NASDAQ:
Q198 - 43,325,000,000
Q298 - 47,570,000,000
Q398 - 25,320,000,000 (half-way)
full Q399 - 49,128,000,000

NYSE:
Q198 - 38,211,000,000
Q298 - 38,302,000,000
Q398 - 21,738,000,000 (half-way)
full Q398 - 45,467,000,000

OTCBB:
Q198 - 6,880,000,000
Q298 - 8,763,000,000
Q398 - 3,650,000,000 (half-way)
full Q398 - 6,841,000,000

Gary Korn



To: Herschel Rubin who wrote (3999)9/15/1999 7:46:00 PM
From: Bob Kim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10027
 
Herschel, From what I understand, revenue per trade is likely to be lower because of lower volatility. That will counter some of the volume effects.