Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (2487)	9/15/1999 6:58:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

Sure it is your bone marrow but it is needed to sustain a siblings life. Just like it is a woman's body this fetus needs to live. There is no question that this body is owned completely by the mother and not by the fetus is there? Is this woman less an owner of her body than the owner of the bone marrow? If so, how so? I see no difference here. There would be a difference if you chose to say the fetus is not a life in the same way the sibling is... that it is somehow more dependent and needs "protection"... but then that backs the pro-life crowd into a corner because that implies the fetus is not eligible for full-life status.