Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (2493)	9/15/1999 7:09:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6418

That has nothing to do with my question. Intent is irrelevant here... after all you can say I drove too fast, got into a car accident and thus caused my own injury... now I need a blood transfusion and I'm type O-negative... blah blah blah... intent is totally irrelevant to my point. What I am hearing you say is that bone marrow or blood, etc. is "owned" by the donor, therefore we should not create laws forcing donation to save anothers life. If I am incorrect here, please correct me.. My question for you is - does a woman own her body in the same way that bone marrow is owned by a donor? Therefore how can you make laws saying she must "donate" her body to this other person? Unless of course you want to create laws forcing organ donation in the defense of "life"... do you?