Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (2504)	9/15/1999 7:32:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

The law regards intent as an essential element. Her argument (which I actually thought was progress for her) is purely clinical in nature and disregards circumstances and intent. There is both a legal and an ethical obligation for parents to care for helpless children. No such obligations exist for sibling organ donors.

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (2504)	9/15/1999 7:33:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

OK, we'll have to agree to disagree. But I believe I have made my point, that pro-lifers are not absolute in their convictions, no matter what they say. I am trying to nail you on the act of abortion and why it is wrong vs. other life and death issues that are accepted in our culture. You keep coming back to "somebody had sex and shouldn't have", in an attempt to avoid the issue of why abortion is wrong. I have asked this question of others and usually I get no response, so I'll give you credit in at least replying.