SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (571)9/15/1999 9:21:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
matter can neither be created nor destroyed
Now you are dragging in complete distortions just so you can add a little scientific venier to your post. LRR, nor anyone else ever claimed matter was appearing out of nowhere. You know this and choose to deliberately try to tie a violation of thermodynamics where none was even hinted. That type of behavior would get you stripped of any professional membership in a scientific society (if you had such credentials).

At most LRR claimed that within vast patterns of random alignment some contained information usefull to reproduction of that information. That's not matter or energy popping out of nowhere!
TP



To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (571)9/15/1999 9:43:00 PM
From: w molloy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
Tunica - re post 571

now you are deliberately obfuscating the issue - a typical ploy
on these threads when you are on the losing side of the argument.

you wrote

Brother Darwin and comrades postulate that one day the bolt appeared from the
sky and we developed hydrogen, then Oxygen then carbon then
Nitrogen.


You clearly know nothing of Darwin. He never said anything of the kind. Darwin was very careful to avoid the creation issue. He
postulated a theory (evolution), a mechanism(natural selection) and supporting evidence(based on observations made during his voyage on the Beagle) to account for the Origin of Species.

This line of argument is reaching a conclusion.

I will publish the most common creationist arguments with rebuttals overnight, then it;s adios.

w.



To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (571)9/15/1999 10:57:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
I think you are pretty safe against argument from me. While I Now Have Built-in Conditioner!!! I can't tell how deep into your cheek (if that is the proper anatomical metaphor for someone named after ... an anatomical metaphor) your tongue is thrust. So I'm not gonna take you on; I'd risk feeling stoopid if I earnestly deconstructed what might be levity. Party on.