Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: idler who wrote (41301)	9/15/1999 11:08:00 PM
From: Cosmo Daisey	Respond to of 152472

Rob, I left your name with her. cdaisey@NY_analyst.com

To: idler who wrote (41301)	9/15/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Respond to of 152472

Especially since you own part of the company~ call me idealistic, but that's what I believe. MileHigh

To: idler who wrote (41301)	9/15/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: RoseCampion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

A note of thanks to everyone who's posted their thoughts, commentary, and speculation today - even more than is normally true, I have found the observations and analysis (on both threads) extremely rewarding. Full subscriptions to all the usual Wall Street rags (and a Bloomberg terminal to boot) couldn't begin to give us a fraction of the insight into a company like Q that we get here. Though I wouldn't have thought it possible after yesterday's market action, I am even more excited about Q's prospects than ever. Days like this go far in upholding the reputation of these threads as some of the finest investment forums on the net. Thanks to all again. -Rose-

To: idler who wrote (41301)	9/16/1999 2:25:00 AM
From: gdichaz	Respond to of 152472

idler: Your case for the need for the Q (and others) to make access available to investors is amply demonstrated by the skill and speed with which you have very kindly reported on that conference. I for one have very very (Dr J term) seldom seen better reporting. Your post is a model for the future. Clear, comprehensive, succinct, and perceptive. Wish an "analyst" could or would do what you have done so well. Again, your action is a clear demonstration of the need for direct investor participation. And, the name "idler" may be fun for you to use, but you show every sign of being about as far from idle, in this case at least, as it is humanly possible to be. Thanks. Chaz