SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Luis who wrote (30809)9/15/1999 11:20:00 PM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 41369
 
FCC rules to encourage local Net
competition
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
September 15, 1999, 4:40 p.m. PT

Federal regulators today acted to protect the big local phone companies from
some competition in their high-speed Internet business, but said the companies
still must share most of their networks with competitors.

The ruling comes after months of lobbying from rival local phone companies that want to
use the Bells' networks to offer their own telephone and Internet services. Both sides see
today's ruling as critical in determining what kinds of companies can survive in the
competitive phone and high-speed Net access markets.

The heated lobbying--prompted by a Supreme Court ruling earlier in the year that forced the
Federal Communications Commission to revise its rules on local network
competition--brought both sides some consolation.

Commissioners did keep most of their old rules intact, saying that companies like Bell
Atlantic and SBC Communications must give smaller
companies access to their lines and much of the
technology inside their phone networks. Because local
phone networks are expensive and difficult to construct, this
is critical to having local phone competition, the
commission said.

But the Bells did convince the commission to keep the
equipment that provides high-speed Internet service out of
the deal. This means that companies like Covad
Communications or NorthPoint Communications can
continue to use Bell Atlantic's phone network--but the Baby
Bell won't have to share specific high-speed Internet
equipment with its competitors.

The ruling effectively closes off the possibility for small
companies to resell the Bells' high-speed Internet service
without adding their own equipment.

Commissioners said any new regulations directed at the
Bell companies would directly slow consumers' access to
high-speed Internet services.

"One of the most important things this agency can do is to ensure we're creating an
environment for aggressive deployment of broadband services," said FCC chairman William
Kennard told Bloomberg.

The decision over access to high-speed Internet equipment is part of a broader ruling
aimed at encouraging local phone competition by giving competitive local providers access
to key equipment.

"The FCC increased regulation of the local telephone companies, but not as much as
feared," said Scott Cleland, managing director of Legg Mason's Precursor Group.

The FCC's rules identify the parts of the Bells networks that must be leased to competitors
at a discount. Rival phone firms welcomed this decision, as they say building a network
from scratch is not only time consuming, but very costly. The Baby Bells, on the other
hand, argued that they should have to sell only specific pieces of their network at a
discount, as the equipment is readily available in the market. The FCC largely agreed with
the new rivals.

The agency's 1996 rules required the Bells and GTE to discount the prices on seven
pieces of their networks, including connections from the central offices, the switches that
direct phone traffic to the right location, and operator and directory services. The Supreme
Court in January ordered the agency to reconsider which network pieces are essential to
the new competitors.

Today, the agency reaffirmed the need for the Bells and GTE to lease most of the pieces
originally required in 1996. One exception is that those companies will no longer be
required to sell directory and operator services to competitors.

Bloomberg contributed to this report.



To: Luis who wrote (30809)9/16/1999 1:13:00 AM
From: CGarcia  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 41369
 
Luis...calm down...I'm in at $171 and I'm not crying...I did that last yr, when I saw my assets drop $80,000....dropping $15,000 on AOL is a breeze in comparison...I won't sell now because we can only go up from here...and even if we don't short term, do you really think AOL will be at $88, 5 years from now?